“One Bin for All” in the running for prize money

OfftheKuff.com

Charles Kuffner

Original article here

unobinoThis happened before the election, which now seems as a remote a time as the 19th century.

 

Houston is one of 20 finalist cities from among the 305 nationwide that applied for a $5 million grant from the Bloomberg Philanthropies for the boldest local initiative to address a national problem.

The city’s proposal, “Total Reuse — One Bin for All,” calls for the construction of a mega-recycling plant that could ultimately allow the city to recycle as much as 75 percent of all residential trash, up from just 14 percent now. More importantly to the average resident, it would allow you to throw all your garbage in a single can and have the city sort it out at the plant.

In the spring, Bloomberg Philanthropies will announce the grand-prize winner of the Mayors Challenge and four $1 million prize winners. This month a team of city officials is invited to attend the Bloomberg Ideas Camp, a two-day gathering in New York City during which they will collaborate with experts to prepare One Bin for All finalist application.

See here for the background, and here for Mayor Parker’s statement. I like the idea of this and I am glad to see focus on Houston’s abysmally low recycling rate, but after I posted that first story I got some feedback from the Texas Campaign for the Environment, which is skeptical of this technology. The following was sent to me by Tyson Sowell to more fully explain their thinking on this:

Houston’s “one bin” waste reduction proposal: What exactly does this mean?

A few weeks ago the City of Houston’s Sustainability Department announced, to much fanfare, that they were considering a “One Bin” solution for collected recyclables, organics (like food waste), and garbage. In the meantime, City of Houston officials say they will keep working to expand single-stream recycling collection while they explore this other option. However, the technologies being mulled over are generally untested. Some technologies promoted by waste lobbyists as brave, new diversion techniques are actually destructive to the environment. While everybody likes innovative thinking, still, we have questions. Here are some questions we encourage Houstonians to ask about Houston’s “One Bin” proposal:

  • How has this technology worked elsewhere? We know that in other states and countries with materials recovery facilities which take in commingled trash and recycling (commingled MRF), they need either incineration or loopholes to reach meaningful “diversion” levels. What the city is proposing would include anaerobic digestion (AD; a process whereby microbes break down organic matter and produce methane to be used for energy) for organics and some of the paper; this is especially untested, and AD systems elsewhere are challenging to operate even with very controlled feedstocks and are very expensive to build. Lancaster, CA has signed a contract to try the technology the city is proposing, so why not wait to observe their performance before jumping in?
  • What will the markets be like for the recovered materials, and how do they compare with what we could get from expanded single-stream recycling? Historically, commingled MRF’s have to sell their paper and cardboard at lower prices because they are contaminated by being mixed in with garbage. The system envisioned here would put much of that paper into the AD, but
    is this a truly “higher and better use” than recycling? Are we saying that Houston is giving up on paper recycling? If so, the city needs to demonstrate why AD is a higher and better use for paper than recycling. TCE Executive Director Robin Schneider visited an out-of-state facility that separates recyclables mixed with trash and the valuable cardboard was clearly degraded.
  • How much would this cost? In particular, what would be the impact on tipping fees? Facilities of this sort in California have tipping fees more than 3 times what we are charged locally. In Dallas they were talking about these facilities in the $100 million range, but since something like this has never been built, we have no idea what cost overruns might look like, or what the long-term contractual obligations for the city might end up being. Ask the cities locked into ugly incinerator contracts from the ‘70s, and they’ll tell you that when it comes to trash technologies, extreme caution is crucial for local governments. Harrisburg PA, for example, has gone into bankruptcy because it went whole hog for what was supposed to be a cure-all incinerator. We need to show great care and proceed slowly before buying into this alleged solution to all of our diversion problems.
  • What will be the full long-term impact on reduction and reuse? Big increases in recycling are good, but not as good as big decreases in total discards. There is an ethical argument that encouraging throwaway mindsets and a disposable culture is absolutely unacceptable. Even under a less strict ethic, this proposal seems to do nothing to encourage reduction and reuse, and may even create incentives to throw things away. How does this proposal ensure that we are using fewer resources and consuming less stuff—not just recycling more—in the long-run?
  • Is this about the best use of our resources, or just the best we expect from Houston? We should not assume that Houston can’t recycle, or that folks here just don’t care enough. Sure, Houston is no San Francisco, but neither is Fresno, and Fresno has a 75% diversion rate without the need for risky new technologies. Fairfax County, Virginia is not setting the world on fire with 42%, but that is still 3 times higher than what we are doing in Houston right now. Orange County, North Carolina is at 61% waste reduction, and Nashville reduced waste by 30% in just three years. Their plan is to get to 60% reduction by 2018, and they are well on their way. Some of these communities—including San Francisco—are curious about the technology proposed here as a means of dealing with what is left over after recycling, composting, reduction, reuse and other diversion activities. Why shouldn’t we follow this same path by passing a Zero Waste Plan with strong benchmarks, putting proven policies in place and then circling back to these proposals once we have finished the basics and other communities have tested this new technology for us?

It be ars repeating that Laura Spanjian, the City’s Director of Sustainability, has made it clear that Houston will continue expanding curbside single-stream service. Houston has more households without curbside recycling than any in Texas and almost any big city in the country. It is clear that we need big changes, that they will not happen overnight and that we will need to be creative and flexible if we are going to catch up to where we ought to be. The least renewable resource of them all is time, but haste on waste policy can mean doing much more harm than good. These questions and others seek to ensure that our planet is the priority, and that Houston reaches true sustainability in a safe, proven and truly innovative fashion.

Some good questions to ponder, and I intend to have a conversation with Laura Spanjian about this in the near future to hear some more answers. The more discussion we have about this, the better. CultureMap has more.


Universal recycling ordinance puts Austin on zero waste track

Your News Now (YNN
Jess Mitchell

The City of Austin’s Universal Recycling Ordinance went into effect Monday. Austin is already the top recycle-friendly city in the state, but the goal is to stop sending all waste to landfills.

It takes a lot of heavy machinery–and about 40 hands–to sort through 25 tons of recyclables per hour. Once it is sorted, the trash makes its way to Balcones Resources new $25 million facility. It takes in the Capitol and University of Texas’ recycling, and starting this week, the center will also process waste from 170,000 Austin households.

“Trucks deliver single stream recyclables either from commercial businesses or from residential generators,” Balcones Resources CEO Kerry Getter said. “Roughly about everything north of the river, or about 60 percent of the volume.”

The new waste will add up to about 8,000 tons of waste per month, and that number will grow with the city’s new ordinance. The new mandate requires all office buildings more than 100,000 square feet and all apartment buildings with more than 75 units to recycle paper, corrugated cardboard, plastic bottles, aluminum cans and glass bottles.”

Andrew Dobbs with the Texas Campaign for the Environment says Austin is on the right track.

“It’s like brushing your teeth or picking up after your dog, it’s just basic decency at this point,” he said. “We have to start looking at these things as resources–there is no way to throw things away–and we have to look at each one of these discards as a resource.”

To put things in perspective, as the top recycler in the state, Austin diverts 40 percent of its waste, with Dallas coming in next at 30 percent. West Coast cities lead the way—San Francisco recycles 75 percent of its waste.


The greening of Houston

622x350Ed Wulfe
Chron.com
Original story here

 

The Bayou Greenway Initiative is a bold and visionary plan to complete parks and trails along the 10 bayous that cross our city, creating an iconic park system that will redefine Houston. More than 20 different organizations have spent nearly $2.4 billion in crafting half the system within the city limits thus far. This November however, with meaningful support from the city, Mayor Annise Parker and you, a parks bond will help connect all these parks and all of these trails into one united and comprehensive system.

Over the past several months, multiple organizations dedicated to Houston’s Bayou Greenway Initiative and a new organization, ParksByYou, have been uniting parks and bayou enthusiasts. Their work aims to mobilize all of us to vote “yes” for Proposition B on the ballot, a parks bond referendum that will pump $166 million into our parks and bayou properties – all of it targeted at real construction and capital improvements. While $66 million will be used to make critical improvements to existing neighborhood parks all across the city, $100 million of those funds will be matched with private dollars to finally close the gaps along our bayou system and create continuous parks and trails. In less than a decade, with these bond dollars, Houston will have more than 150 miles of trails and a park system like no other in America. Our bayous are Houston’s unique natural feature and will be improved, enhanced and expanded, rather than paved and neglected as in the past. Proposition B is a way to create parks and green space for all of us to experience and enjoy with no increase in taxes.

Our bayous meander through almost every neighborhood, and by building a system of connected linear parks along their banks, we will ensure that a majority of Houstonians will have access to green space within just a few miles of work or school or home. It’s been shown that regular physical activity reduces the risk of obesity, heart disease, diabetes and other diseases, and there is strong evidence showing that people exercise more when they have convenient access to parks and recreational opportunities. A vote for the parks bond will contribute to the overall health of Houston’s population while simultaneously enhancing our quality of life.

Parks along our bayous will inspire and energize economic development, increase property values, improve flood control and help manage water quality. The desirability of property located near parks and green space is high because people are attracted to inviting and pleasurable places to play and exercise, resulting in stronger and more active neighborhoods with appealing places for people of all ages.

Parks are transformational and will strengthen our ability to attract employers and employees to our area, and will serve to help encourage and retain a talented workforce. Houston has long been known as a city of opportunity and a good place to work in a diverse and open society. But today, we are competing with many other cities in the U.S. and abroad for businesses seeking to relocate, and our future economic health depends on our ability to continue developing as a city where people want to work and live. Talented young professionals strongly consider quality of life when choosing where to settle, and access to parks is a vitally important element in the quality-of-life equation. The Bayou Greenways project with its linear park concept supported by Proposition B will give Houston the nation’s largest system of accessible recreational trails, and strengthen our advantage in the national and international competition for the workforce of the future.

The parks referendum, Proposition B on the ballot, is one of five city of Houston measures we will be asked to consider on Nov. 6. At the bottom of the ballot, after making our choices for the president, the Congress, state and local representatives, and judges, we will be able to vote for parks. The other four referenda will allow us all to approve libraries, police and fire stations, and recycling centers. Remarkably, the city bonds will not require a property tax increase, and every single measure will make our lives better, healthier and fun. By voting yes for every one of these proposals, you’ll be voting YES for Houston’s future.

Wulfe serves as chairman of the Greater Houston Partnership‘s Quality of Life Committee and co-chairman of the Bayou Greenway Initiative.


Texas Campaign for the Environment visits El Paso

KTSM News El Paso
Bianca Cervantes

EL PASO — In El Paso, many of us already recycle cans, paper and plastic, but the Texas Campaign for the Environment says we can do even better. They’re urging people to recycle electronic waste, joining us with more on how you can do that is Renee Vaughan with Texas Campaign for the Environment.


Interfaith Coalition Urges Walmart to “Take It Back”

Triple Pundit
Leon Kaye

It is proxy season, which means all kinds of shareholder resolutions and protests are targeting some of America’s largest companies for a host of reasons. One company in the crosshairs is Walmart, the focus of organizations including the Texas Campaign for the Environment and Take It Back Walmart. Both organizations have published a letter to Walmart urging the discount retail giant to do more about e-waste.

Particularly interesting is that the “Open Letter” had the signature of over 100 faith leaders from all 50 U.S. states. While commending Walmart for its sustainability efforts that the company has ramped up since 2005, the reverends, priests, rabbis, imams and activists from churches and activist organizations demand that Walmart do even more. The faith community taking on companies is nothing new. What is impressive is the positive message the letter imparts, acknowledging the company has achieved much on this front, and now insisting that Walmart embrace more recycling and closed-loop programs.

The letter points out that Walmart sells more than $50 billion in electronics annually, and is therefore in a strong position to take a stand on the improved disposal and recycling of e-waste. The faith leaders also nudge the company to participate more in programs that encourage the greener design of electronics while preventing any schemes that send e-waste abroad to developing countries. Pointing out that Staples, Best Buy and Office Depot all accept unwanted electronics, the religious leaders say in the letter that it is time for Walmart to do the same.

So far Walmart has not said much on the issue. The company’s VP for sustainability, Andrea Thomas, has told the group behind the letter that Walmart has “an internal cross functional team that is actively engaged on the issue,” an exercise in public relations linguistic gymnastics that in English means, “we are working on it.”

The lessons for companies such as Walmart is that while publicly traded corporates have a bevy of responsibilities to their shareholders under U.S. law, including maximizing the company’s value, excuses on any issues of corporate social responsibility or governance are wearing thinner with consumers and other stakeholder groups. Furthermore a robust market for e-waste exists and plenty of companies are eager to pounce on the economic opportunities. It should not take too much creativity out of Bentonville to launch an ambitious electronic waste program that will embarrass other retailers and manufacturers to fall into line and do the same and position Walmart yet again as a leader. This Open Letter is an opportunity, not a hassle, and opens the door to proving that one of the world’s largest companies can boost profits as well as values.


Austin City Council approves March 2013 single-use bag ban

Community Impact Newspaper
Mitzie Stelte

The Austin City Council unanimously passed a bag ban ordinance March 1 on both paper and plastic bags beginning in March 2013. The ban is one of the broadest in the country, and Austin is the largest city in Texas to ban single-use bags.

Council members made some modifications to the ordinance, which included eliminating a transaction fee for disposable bags, as well as doing away with a transitional period of one year prior to the ban. Members added an education campaign on the new ban that is estimated to cost between $1.5 and $2 million, according to Austin Resource Recovery Director Bob Gedert.

There are a few exceptions to the ban, such as plastic bags used at dry cleaners as well as exemptions for disposable bags used by local food banks.

The public hearing on the ban was set to begin at 4 p.m., but due to a packed agenda, the bag ban was not discussed until close to midnight, with a vote taken a little after 2 a.m. Several members of the public who support the ban, however, stuck around to testify, including Robin Schneider of the Texas Campaign for the Environment who said after years of debate, now was the time to finally institute the ban.

“This is a huge step to clean up our communities across the planet,” she said.

Leslie Sweet, who represented H-E-B, testified that the retailer supports the ban, though she suggested the possibility of an ongoing emergency fee of $1.50 for those who forget a reusable bag. In that emergency case, the customer would be issued a paper or plastic one. Sweet said in Brownsville, where plastic bags are currently banned, an emergency fee resulted in 85 percent of customers switching to reusable bags within six months. She said the fee could go to either H-E-B or the city.

While Mayor Lee Leffingwell said he would consider the possibility of an emergency option to be added later during the policy’s development, he was not quite sure if the $1.50 fee was appropriate or if the city receive those funds.

“My knee-jerk reaction is I rather keep the city out of that transaction,” Leffingwell said.

Ronnie Volkening, president and CEO of the Texas Retailers Association, spoke in opposition to the ban, saying there was a lack of emphasis on education and recycling. A complete ban sends the message that “no collaborative action on be taken to divert these bags from landfills,” he said.


City forms 30-year plan to get Austin to ‘zero waste’

Community Impact
Bobby Longoria

The City of Austin will soon implement a complex overhaul of its waste plan that includes a large recycling initiative, a new composting method and waste reduction efforts that would reduce costs for those who produce less waste.austin-chart13-info

Under Austin Resource Recovery’s master plan, the city hopes to have 95 percent of its waste diverted away from landfills and back into everyday use by 2040. Austin Resource Recovery was formerly named the Solid Waste Services Department.

“It’s a different way of looking at our waste streams—it’s material that should have a second life and not be thrown away, because there is added value in it,” said Bob Gedert, director of Austin Resource Recovery.

Meeting zero-waste goals

Austin Resource Recovery’s master plan has set waste diversion benchmarks every five years, beginning with 35 percent diversion in 2010, 50 percent diversion in 2015 and ultimately 95 percent diversion in 2040. The plan’s goals were presented to the Austin City Council on Nov. 10. As of press time, Council was scheduled to adopt the plan Dec. 15.

To achieve the benchmarked zero-waste goals, several new initiatives must be introduced, including more recycling and reuse centers and new composting carts for residents that would become available in 2015. Composting carts would be used for organic materials including food scraps and other materials that may rot or produce methane gas.

Both efforts would require an increase in fees to cover the cost of maintaining and building new centers and introducing a new fleet of compost collectors. Customer waste carts would carry varying fees, which Gedert said encourages waste reduction and could eventually save customers money.

Now, about 60 percent of Austin Resource Recovery customers use a 64-gallon trash cart and 30 percent use a 96-gallon cart. The remaining 10 percent use either 32-gallon cart or the 21-gallon trash cart, which was introduced in October, Gedert said.

Forming a zero-waste plan

Austin hired waste consultant Gary Liss in 2007 to form its 2008 zero-waste strategic plan. The city rehired him to help develop the Austin Resource Recovery’s master plan, which serves as an implementation strategy to accomplish Austin’s zero-waste goal.

According to Liss, Austin was the first city in the country to have a major curbside recycling program in the late 1980s. Austin stayed ahead of the curve by implementing an ordinance that required businesses to recycle, but by 2005, those methods had become main stream.

Austin overlooked several important concepts however, including food-scrap processing and the management of construction and demolition debris, Liss said. The recycling ordinance only applied to businesses with more than 100 employees, limiting its scope. Green building standards were applied in Austin except in the Central Business District, another necessary fix.

By adjusting local, regional and state landfill fees and surcharges, Liss said the zero-waste plan helped the private sector reduce waste and find ways to make existing products more recyclable.

Public education

Convincing residents to reduce their waste will require some education, said Robin Schneider, director of Texas Campaign for the Environment.

“You need to make it as convenient and painless for folks and make the case as to why it is important,” Schneider said. “Most people want to do their part.”

Gedert estimates that 50 percent of household waste is recyclable, 40 percent is compostable and 10 percent is hazardous or nonrecyclable. Taking on this initiative will help promote a greener attitude among residents, he said.

“Going above and beyond shows leadership,” Gedert said. “Being green and promoting a reusable, recyclable society is a high value within our residents. We are reflecting the voice of the community as we develop this zero-waste plan.”

Austin Resource Recovery will conduct a waste characterization study in the next year that will focus on material that is generated at the household level in order to refine the estimation.

 

 


Green Groups Add Muscle in Texas, Gird for Uphill Battles

New York Times
Nathaniel Gronewold of Greenwire

AUSTIN, Texas — This famously “weird” city long has been seen as the Lone Star State’s greenest. But in April, Dallas briefly stole that title when it played host to the nation’s second-largest Earth Day celebration.

Organizers attracted 48,000 people to their inaugural event, just shy of the 50,000 people who turned out for the celebration in New York City, according to the Earth Day Network.

“Everybody said: ‘Dallas? Texas? Earth Day? You’ve got to be kidding me,'” recalled Earth Day Dallas director Susan Brosin. “We are perceived to be antiquated.”

Earth Day Dallas organizers say their celebration next year should be even larger than New York’s with 75,000 people projected to attend an event that will feature twice as many exhibitors. They are confident, Brosin said, because Texans are warming up the environmental movement, and Dallas is no exception.

Texas is still a famously pro-development, pro-business state where oil is king and “environmentalist” long has been something of a dirty word. Gov. Rick Perry, now a leading candidate for the Republican presidential nomination, is better known among the green community here as the guy who shot a coyote while jogging in Austin (to protect his dog, as the governor explained it).

But environmental organizations are spreading their influence across Texas. National and state-based groups are adding staff at the state capital or opening new field offices in other major metropolitan areas. Others, like the Texas Campaign for the Environment, (TCE) are branching out to every corner of the state soon.

The Sierra Club Lone Star Chapter’s operations have grown enough to warrant a bigger office, just a few short tree-lined blocks from the Texas State Capitol.

The chapter staff is expanding, as is the “number of national staff who work directly for the Sierra Club nationally in Texas,” said chapter director Ken Kramer. The growth is mostly to help with the group’s anti-coal campaign, and thanks to a recent $50 million donation by the Bloomberg Family Foundation, “we’ll see some more expansion of that side of the operation,” he added.

Groups like the Texas Wildlife Association, Houston Audubon, the Galveston Bay Foundation and the Coastal Conservation Association also are increasingly active. The Texas Conservation Alliance (TCA), an umbrella group that helps to coordinate efforts, now counts 48 separate organizations as members, and TCA itself boasts of enjoying increased funding, visibility and influence.

The Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) has enjoyed modest expansion lately as they have grown busier. Aside from assisting with the national movement toward tighter controls over the oil and gas industry, EDF is also hoping to get Texans fired up about energy efficiency.

“It’s a good time to be in Texas,” said Sierra Club’s national communications strategist Oliver Bernstein, after listing the litany of issues that will keep their house humming with activity in years to come.

Targeting coal-fired power

In addition to the group’s Beyond Coal campaign, a top priority will be support for the state’s renewable energy industry. And Sierra Club campaigners are laying the groundwork for a grass-roots mobilization against an expanding nuclear waste depository near the New Mexico state line, although that is a battle made more difficult by legislation they failed to block this year.

Many groups active in the state say they are enjoying more financing and resources than ever before. Paid memberships and the number of volunteers are growing, too. Some even say their movement is more unified than ever.

“I have been involved in environmental initiatives on the national level that had a lot of turf pawning and even backstabbing,” said Janice Bezanson, director of the TCA. “Virtually none of that is in Texas.”

Despite their upbeat mood, the status quo in the state has not changed all that much, said University of North Texas political scientist John Todd. He said groups have enjoyed modest successes recently but are nowhere near changing how things are fundamentally done in Texas.

“I’m surprised that environmentalists think they are making a lot of headway in the state right now,” Todd said. “It seems to me that the pro-jobs thing is still the most important, and anything that’s seen as an impediment to creating jobs is subject to sacrifice.”

To be sure, Texas environmentalists admit that most targets of their activism — oil and gas firms, the chemical industry, major infrastructure contractors to name a few — are still much stronger and tend to have greater clout in the political scene. But they also point to victories that even surprise them in some instances as justification for growing optimism.

One example is the deal between the Environmental Defense Fund’s Texas office and Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. to eliminate eight planned coal power plants that would have been built by the power company TXU Energy. EDF also won promises for greater environmental controls for the two plants that remained on the drawing board.

The Sierra Club and other groups are fighting to keep other coal-fired plants from coming online. They acknowledge an uphill battle on that front, but also take credit for significantly slowing plans to build a 1,300-megawatt ultra-efficient coal-fired plant called the White Stallion Energy Center.

White Stallion’s developers, however, dispute that take.

“The opposition has nothing to do with the postponement,” said White Stallion local development director Rikki Stanley. “The LCRA [Lower Colorado River Authority], the people we are buying the water from, needed a longer period to study the contract. We made some minor changes to that contract so the LCRA is studying these.”

Meanwhile Texans for a Sound Energy Policy are locked in a separate battle with Exelon Corp. over a planned nuclear power plant near Victoria. The group fears that the location puts nearby bays and endangered whooping cranes at risk. TSEP officials believe they are slowly winning that fight.

Environmentalists in Texas also think more scrutiny of hydraulic fracturing — a controversial natural gas extraction technique — is beginning to bleed into the state. They cite national debate in helping them win passage of a state law requiring oil and gas companies to disclose what chemicals they use in the process, the first in the nation. They plan to push for more regulation.

Conservation ethic

Setbacks are still sometimes as frequent as successes, groups admit.

At the end of the 2011 legislative session, the Austin offices of the Sierra Club, the Environmental Defense Fund, Public Citizen and the SEED Coalition held a call with reporters to declare their disappointment. They decried a postponement in oil and gas development air quality rules, cuts to funding for state parks and the death of a solar panel incentive bill.

“I’d be reluctant to ever say that winning an environmental battle in Texas is easy,” said Sierra Club’s Kramer. Still others are generally encouraged by the successes they have had in the state recently.

Though 95 percent of Texas is privately held, Laura Hoffman, state director of the Nature Conservancy of Texas, said her group has managed to carve out 30 nature preserves. One, the 177-acre Gypsum Dunes Preserve, was deeded this year to the National Park Service to expand the Guadalupe Mountains National Park. Hoffman also points to innovative conservation easement programs that have been able to extend land and wildlife protections into large expanses of privately held tracks.

Working with the state and property owners has not been as difficult as many may think, Hoffman said.

“A fairly misunderstood perception about Texas is that there isn’t a strong conservation ethic here, and that extends from the fact that so much of Texas is privately owned,” Hoffman said. “People feel very strongly about the landscape in Texas.”

In what could be one of their biggest wins, the Nature Conservancy helped write a bill for public vote in November that would create the nation’s first system of tax incentives for water conservation on private land. The Texas Department of Agriculture strongly supports the measure, hoping that it will ease the state’s vulnerability to droughts like the record-busting one hitting the state this year.

“We have rates on a property at below property tax system for timberlands, for agricultural lands and wildlife lands, and I think this would create a new category of eligibility and an incentive to develop their lands for water conservation,” said Texas Agriculture Commissioner Todd Staples in an interview.

Campaigners have also linked their interests with that of other constituencies to halt developments they oppose. For instance, private land owners, the timber industry, and hunting and fishing clubs have been instrumental in blocking new reservoir construction, said TCA’s Bezanson.

Such alternative allies, notes Sierra Club’s Bernstein, prefer to be called “conservationists” rather than “environmentalists,” a better fit in a conservative state.

Some victories are attracting new interest and funding.

“We have had a very successful summer, with a lot of new members joining up with the organization,” said Luke Metzger, director of Environment Texas, of his group’s most recent fundraising efforts. “It’s been one of our best years in the last several.”

Spun off about five years ago from the Texas Public Interest Research Group, Environment Texas has since grown to more than 5,000 members, Metzger estimates. They sit exclusively in Austin now, but the organization is eyeing expansion to Houston and the Dallas-Fort Worth area.

Since its founding, the group has made a name for itself by suing some of the world’s largest oil and gas companies to clean up air pollution from chemical plants and refineries in Galveston Bay.

That effort led to two settlements, with Royal Dutch Shell PLC and Chevron Phillips (a joint venture between Chevron and ConocoPhillips), to cut air pollution by 80 percent and 85 percent respectively and to pay combined fines of $8 million. Environment Texas has since filed suit against Exxon Mobil Corp.

The group is also gearing up to defend forthcoming U.S. EPA rules on stormwater pollution. On that front, Metzger anticipates a tough fight given that the state’s attorney general has already sued EPA on air pollution rules numerous times. Indeed, the ever-shifting realities of state politics is grounds for only cautious optimism, he warns.

“The political situation definitely makes it tough to win very strong reforms, so as a result we partner to kind of build a movement,” Metzger explained. “It’s a tough situation, but I think that we, despite Texas’ reputation, have made a lot of progress in the last decade.”

‘Two steps forward, one step back’

The Texas Campaign for the Environment appears the most upbeat about the future among the dozens of active state groups.

Already established in all the major metropolitan areas, TCE last year attracted donations from more than 60,000 Texans. It only added up to $1.55 million in 2010, but it is enough to allow them to extend their influence across the state, officials there say. New operations are planned for Wichita Falls, Texarkana, Lubbock, San Angelo and Paris (Texas).

The reason, explains TCE executive director Robin Schneider, is the growing popularity of recycling in the state. Recently TCE successively lobbied Austin lawmakers and Perry to pass state electronic-waste recycling programs targeting televisions and computers. They are now working to expand solid waste recycling in not only the largest cities but to as many municipalities as they can reach, she said.

“We are also expanding beyond where we have permanent offices and organizing in communities that we’ve never been in before, and have had enormous success in places where you wouldn’t necessarily expect folks to be all that concerned,” Schneider said.

All the big cities except Houston have established some kind of citywide recycling systems, and their programs are gradually becoming more ambitious. San Antonio is said to be the strongest municipal recycler and will be the first to establish recycling collection in multifamily housing units. Activists in Austin hope to do better, and officials here plan to unveil the details of Texas’ first proposed “zero waste” initiative at the State of Texas Alliance for Recycling (STAR) conference next month.

But even STAR warns not to read too much into the enthusiasm for recycling that TCE has tapped in to. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) does not track recycling levels, but TCEQ solid waste processing data shows that the amount of material reaching Texas’ cheap landfills has grown “extraordinarily rapidly,” said STAR executive director Maia Corbitt.

“We have not seen a proportionate increase in recycling infrastructure,” Corbitt noted.

Many environmentalists in the state characterize their efforts a frustrating “two steps forward, one step back” process.

They are most upset at the failure to pass a new solar power incentive program. That initiative would have seen sunny Texas join the ranks of California, Colorado, New Jersey and other states where solar power capacity is rapidly expanding. They will try again in 2013 (lawmakers in Texas meet in regular session only every two years).

But movement insiders also point to a gradual shift in attitudes toward their points of view in general throughout the state. That, in turn, is leading to some victories that they previously thought they had no chance of winning.

For instance, a measure debated during the 2011 legislative session sponsored by the state’s chemical industry would have pre-empted any local government from instituting bans on plastic bags, a response to two such ordinances passed in Brownsville and Fort Stockton.

It failed. Supporters from those communities swayed lawmakers by describing their disgust over discarded bags littering their landscapes. They also noted the irony of the state telling the cities what they can and cannot do while Texas simultaneously fights similar strong-arming from Washington, D.C.

“That surprised even me,” said Schneider on the move’s failure to pass. “I knew it would be introduced and I was very concerned that it would sail through.”


Electronic recycling takes step forward

KXAN News Austin
Jessica Brorman

AUSTIN (KXAN) – The use and production of electronics continues to grow at a dizzying pace. That means every new electronic product, whether it’s a Blackberry, PC, iPod or flat-screen TV, is future e-waste.

E-waste is the 2.5 million tons of old and obsolete electronic equipment that Americans discard every day. And it contains toxic materials that flow into our waste stream.

Obama administration officials met with senior executives from Sony, Dell and Sprint Wednesday at an Austin electronics recycling center to sign and release a strategy for the responsible management and recycling of electronic products.

The strategy, titled the “National Strategy for Electronics Stewardship,” is a step in creating economic development and jobs by creating a strong electronics recycling market.

The venture includes the first voluntary commitments made by Dell, Sprint and Sony to the Environmental Protection Agency’s industry partnership aimed at promoting the environmentally sound management of used electronics.

It also aims to encourage businesses and consumers to recycle their electronics with certified recyclers, and for electronic recyclers to become certified.

The federal government is the nation’s largest single consumer of electronics. Through this report, it committed to take specific actions that will encourage the more environmentally friendly design of used or discarded electronics, and advance a domestic market for electronics recycling that will protect public health and create jobs.

As outlined in the strategy report, the federal government will:

– Promote the development of more efficient and sustainable electronic products Direct federal agencies to buy, use, reuse and recycle their electronics responsibly
– Support recycling options and systems for American consumers
– Strengthen America’s role in the international electronics stewardship arena.

Nancy Sutley, who chairs the White House Council on Environmental Quality, said the partnership is not only good for human and environment health, but will have an economically sound effect as well.

“This strategy will encourage the recycling of these valuable resources and allow the U.S.to take advantage of the economic opportunities of remanufacturing and create jobs of the future here in America,” Sutley said.

Dell CEO Michael Dell said this agreement will help the company reach its goal to recycle 1 billion pounds of end-of-life electronics by 2014.

“We encourage everyone in our industry to commit to easier, more responsible recycling as we all work to protect our planet,” Dell said.

A statement released by the Texas Campaign for the Environment said that although this report shows positive steps in fixing America’s e-waste problem, more legislative action need to take place to really make a difference.

“The report released by the EPA detailing a national task force for electronics recycling standards has many good steps in the right direction, but the recommendations in the report don’t go far enough. Texas Campaign for the Environment and allies are pushing a bi-partisan, federal bill to halt illegal e-waste export dumping overseas. We would like to have the support of all members of Congress and the President on this very important legislation that will boost jobs and economic growth in America.”

The non-profit organization that works to improve and protect the quality of life for Texans and the environment. It has worked with the national Electronics TakeBack Coalition to pass federal legislation to put an end e-waste.

TCE also has a federal legislative campaign that pushes lawmakers to make electronics producers take back and recycle their obsolete products and to ban the exportation of e-waste.


No-bid recycling contract could get held up

Houston Chronicle
Chris Moran

There’s a 20-year no-bid contract on today’s City Council agenda.

That’s legal because it’s an amendment to an existing contract, not a new contract.

But it’s still got Councilman Ed Gonzalez‘s attention. He tagged it last week so that it could not be voted on until today. And today, City Hall sources say, Gonzalez will propose sending it back to the administration to have the recycling contract bid competitively.

“The markets are emerging and the value of the commodity is emerging,” Councilman C.O. Bradford said Tuesday, and that emerging value is increasing. “So why would we lock ourselves into a 20-year deal?”

Environmentalists are also questioning the wisdom of the contract.

“We think it makes common sense that it should be bid because you’re going to get a better deal for Houston taxpayers if you have an open, competitive process,” said Zac Trahan of the Texas Campaign for the Environment.

So why not bid it? A spokesman for the city’s Solid Waste Management Department said that the department talked informally with a couple of companies and found that Waste Management, which currently takes city recyclables, offered the best deal.

“That’s always a question, but based on informal discussions we had with the current single-stream companies (which take all forms of recyclables) in town, what was offered to us through that informal discussion, the benefits weren’t in comparison with each other,” said Gary Readore, chief of staff for Solid Waste.

The deal itself nets the city $2 million more than if it just continued leasing land to Waste Management to run its recycling operation. The gain comes through Waste Management giving the city 15,000 big green recycling carts this year and 1,500 carts a year thereafter.

Readore said that if the contract has to be bid, it will likely take six to 12 months. Only if the carts are part of the deal that results will the city get them. The city cannot afford them now, Readore said. So bidding the contract will delay the expansion of curbside recycling for the time it takes to bid the contract out, he said.

Update: Mayor Parker said the item will be pulled from today’s agenda and re-examined by the administration.