Dallas residents’ voices heard at City Hall: We need recycling in apartments, businesses

Dallas Zero Waste Alliance
By Corey Troiani
Original article here

Texas Campaign for the Environment presented personalized letters from Dallas residents to City Council members during a November 14th committee update on the City’s long-term “Zero Waste” plan to expand recycling. Two City Council members, Philip Kingston and Sandy Greyson, spoke in favor of fast-tracking a universal recycling ordinance if apartments and businesses don’t start recycling programs soon.

It’s been nearly four years since the City of Dallas passed its Zero Waste Plan, following only the City of Austin with the first plan of its kind in the state. While substantial progress has been made in Austin—with a city-wide recycling rate of 42% and the recent adoption of a third bin for residential food composting—Dallas has struggled to implement meaningful programs and policies to break from the rut of a 20% recycling rate.

The City of Dallas Sanitation Department presented its second status update on the City’s resource diversion efforts since the adoption of the Zero Waste Plan in 2013. To put it bluntly, no one on City Council was impressed by the data showing the City had not increased its recycling rate at all in the past four years. But before you start drafting an angry letter to the Sanitation Department, you have to understand that, in a way, their hands have been tied.

The City’s Zero Waste Plan, as approved by City Council, allowed for a 6-year “grace period” to track and measure recycling data, survey commercial enterprises about their waste and recycling programs, and ultimately seek voluntary measures and incentives to encourage businesses to provide recycling for tenants and residents. The Sanitation Department has worked tirelessly to craft creative programs to incentivize recycling participation, but without any requirements for apartments and businesses to recycle, there is only so much that city officials can do to keep Dallas on the path to becoming a Zero Waste City.

As a result, the Sanitation Department presented the Quality of Life and Environment Committee with short term strategies to increase our recycling rate without uttering the word “recycling ordinance.” Many of the Department’s recommendations—like separating residential collection of bulk and brush materials so organic materials can be composted—were sensible and important. But even in their own best case, these initiatives would fall just short of the 2020 goal of 40% city-wide recycling.

The most recent meeting kicked off with representatives from Texas Campaign for the Environment delivering hand-written and personalized letters to the councilmembers from their constituents. The letters were collected through door-to-door canvassing in apartment buildings and homes throughout the city and urged officials to implement recycling in workplaces and multi-family buildings as soon as possible. Several City Council members commented on the importance of public input such as this.

Councilmember Tiffinni Young s summed it up: “Thank you for these letters. It great when we have our citizens who are advocating on different issues.”

Councilmember Philip Kingston expressed his frustration with the lack of progress, saying “I would say that it’s pretty clear from the data you presented that we’re going to be woefully short [of our recycling goal] by 2019. And I know I’m not the only one who has said repeatedly to the Apartment Association, ‘tick tock, it’s coming…’ and the idea that we’re going to do this phase-in after 2019 and maybe get it done by, I don’t know, 2021 or something, is not consistent with what this council adopted in 2013.” Kingston went on to advocate for fast-tracking a recycling ordinance that would result in universal recycling in commercial buildings and apartments. Committee Chair Sandy Greyson followed by saying, “I do remember when we implemented this in 2013, and some folks felt that giving a 6-year grace period for voluntary efforts was too long. So, I tend to sort of agree with Mr. Kingston that … we’ll implement a [universal recycling ordinance] in 2019 if we continue to see the slow, slow progress that’s being made.”

While the City’s residential recycling program has made up the lion’s share of recycling activity in Dallas, this program covers less than half of Dallas residents. Most residents rely on their apartment management to provide a privately contracted service.

Greyson went on to say, if we’re going to be asking residential folks to make major changes [to bulk and brush pick-up] to help us get there, then I don’t think it is unfair to ask the commercial sectors to make … changes so they can help get us there also.”

No committee members spoke in opposition to fast-tracking a recycling ordinance, which remains a good signal for recycling advocates who will continue to persuade other council members to support the policy.

“I forgot to thank Texas Campaign for the Environment for the letters. Having written one … to the Texas Legislature I think these are valuable. If you have a constituent who takes time to do this, then you have some indication of the seriousness with which people take these issues” Philip Kingston said.

Texas Campaign for the Environment and its allies will continue to put pressure on councilmembers to support a universal recycling ordinance (URO) through letter-writing and advocacy campaigns.

You can sign the petition to expand recycling in Dallas here. You can also write a personalized letter to your councilmember and TCE will deliver it to City Hall during their upcoming meetings.

TCE Dallas Address:
3303 Lee Parkway Suite #402
Dallas, TX 75219


Corey Troiani
DFW Program Director

Galveston at front of bag-ban battle

Houston Chronicle
By Harvey Rice
Original article here

GALVESTON – Reacting to a groundswell of concern about the effect of plastic bags on the environment, Galveston is on the forefront of a statewide controversy over cities’ ability to ban plastic bags that are killing turtles, birds and fouling beaches.

A proposed ordinance with unanimous City Council support and strong community backing faces fierce opposition from outside forces, including conservative think tanks and plastic bag manufacturers who have already sent threatening letters.

About 11 cities in Texas ban plastic bags, and several of them are facing lawsuits over the bans. Dallas quickly rescinded a 5-cent tax on plastic bags last year after bag manufacturers filed a lawsuit.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton is suing Brownsville for imposing a $1 per transaction fee at businesses that continue to offer disposable bags, and a lawsuit against Laredo by the Laredo Merchants Association is before the Texas Supreme Court.

State Sen. Bob Hall, R-Edgewood, a self-described tea party activist, has introduced Senate Bill 103 to prevent municipalities from banning or taxing plastic bags.

Advocates say the bags are an annoying eyesore that clog sewers and are found drifting in the ocean, contributing to the “great Pacific garbage patch,” a conglomeration of plastic the size of Texas in the middle of the Pacific Ocean. Ranchers complain that cattle eat the bags and die, a problem that led Fort Stockton in West Texas to approve a ban.

After suffering state-wide bans in Hawaii and California, plastic bag manufacturers and their allies are taking a stand in Texas.

Nelson, Mullins, Riley & Scarborough LLP, a law firm based in Columbia, S.C., sent a warning letter that council members were given at a recent workshop where they discussed a draft of the bag-ban ordinance.

“It didn’t faze me,” said Councilman Craig Brown, who urged the city attorney to draft the ordinance.

The other council members appeared to be unaffected by the threat, voicing their unanimous support for the idea.

Brown said he expected the council to vote on the ordinance by the middle of next year. Once it takes effect, retailers will have a year to phase out plastic bags.

Custodians of the Gulf

A concerted attempt to organize support for reusable bags began in 2013 when a group of Galveston residents met and dubbed the campaign “Bring the Bag,” said Joanie Steinhaus, who heads the Galveston office of the Turtle Island Restoration Network. Word of the effort reached Robert Lynch, president of the Harris & Eliza Kempner Fund, which made $20,000 available for purchasing reusable bags for small businesses affected by the new ordinance once it’s approved.

Lynch saw nationwide plastic bag bans in his international travels, even in Rwanda, a small country in Africa. “If Rwanda can do this, why can’t Galveston?” he asked.

“One of the major reasons we need to outlaw the bags is a lot of them are floating out on the water and thus killing a lot of marine life out there,” Lynch said. “We are the custodians of our beach and our Gulf.”

Not all businesses support the ban, but it has the backing of the influential Galveston Hotel and Lodging Association. “As business operators we typically don’t like this type of business regulation,” said Steve Cunningham, association president and manager of the Hotel Galvez. “But being on the Gulf, this one is necessary because of the damage to the wildlife and the environment.”

City Attorney Don Glywasky drafted the Galveston ordinance to avoid the legal pitfalls encountered by cities such as Laredo. The Laredo bag ban was challenged under the 1993 Solid Waste Disposal law that bars local governments from adopting regulations to “prohibit or restrict, for solid waste management purposes, the sale or use of a container or package in a manner not authorized by state law.”

Glywasky believes Galveston is unique. “I don’t really see that this is a solid waste management issue,” he said. “If we can cut down on some of the plastic bags that go into the marine environment, that is not something for the purpose of solid waste, it is for the protection of the marine environment on which we depend.”

That argument drew no sympathy from an influential conservative organization, the Texas Public Policy Foundation. James Quintero, director of the foundation’s Center for Local Governance and Think Local Liberty, said Galveston’s proposed ordinance conflicts with state law.

“Our position would be that Galveston’s ordinance, no matter what the stated reason would be, is still prohibiting containers,” said Bryan Mathew, policy analyst for Texas Public Policy Foundation. “In our view, a lot of local governments have been attempting to regulate out of bounds by hiding under the term of local control.”


Mathew called anything that smacks of what Gov. Greg Abbott lamented were attempts to make Texas more like California “out of bounds.”

“Texas is being California-ized and you may not even be noticing it,” Abbott said last year during remarks at a Public Policy Foundation gathering, where he warned of “a patchwork quilt of bans and rules and regulations that is eroding the Texas model.”

That erosion would include anything that hinders “people from being able to sell and buy with minimal government regulation and a low tax burden,” Mathew said.

Mathew saw no contradiction with the traditional conservative support for local control, arguing that local control refers to legislatures, not local governments.

“Utter hogwash,” said Zac Trahan, spokesman for Texas Campaign for the Environment. “They made it up this last year to justify their abandonment of local control.”

Bills in previous legislative sessions aimed at shackling local authority to ban plastic bags have died quick deaths, but this year could be different, warned Melanie Scruggs, program director for the Texas Campaign for the Environment’s Houston office.

Bills aiming at restricting cities’ rights to ban plastic bags, like SB 103, are sure to run into stiff opposition from organizations like the Texas Municipal League. “It’s an abandonment of the concept of local control,” said Bennett Sandlin, Municipal League executive director. “Most cities will never do it, but for the cities that want to do it, they have good reasons.”

He said it would be a mistake for the Legislature to impose a solution that might not be right for every city.

On the other side are powerful business organizations like the Texas Retailers Association. “The patchwork of requirements put in place by these bans on a local level make it increasingly difficult for retailers to accurately comply while also not being effective in making a positive environmental impact,” association President George Kelemen said in an email. “TRA supports Sen. Hall’s legislation as filed.”

High court may decide

Scruggs said a coalition of diverse organizations is ready to back legislation strengthening local control, although a bill had not been introduced as of the last week in November.

A Texas Supreme Court decision in the Laredo case also could undermine or strengthen local authority. Laredo argued that its ban was for beautification and clogged sewer drains and had nothing to do with solid waste, but the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled otherwise in August. The city appealed and the Supreme Court is expected to rule sometime next year.

Galveston officials appear to know exactly what they are getting into.

“I’m proud of Galveston for moving forward on this even though they knew the industry bullies would be after them,” said Trahan, the Campaign for the Environment spokesman.